Thursday, December 9, 2010

APP AC urges writing Board on Garfield

The APP AC sent e-mails to the APP AC Google Group urging parents to contact their school board members to advocate for not splitting APP at Garfield.

An excerpt:
School Board members ... support ... Ingraham as an *optional* path for APP ... [but they want] ... APP students [to] commit very soon to go to Ingraham -- otherwise they will want to impose a geographic north/south split for ease and predictability of student assignment. A GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT AT HIGH SCHOOL CANNOT HAPPEN!

We suggest you use whatever information we've sent that resonates with you and your family, together with your own personal experiences, to craft a *BRIEF* email to your School Board member. Be sure to cc all School Board Directors, the Superintendent, CAO, Advanced Learning Manager, and the APP AC.

It is most important to request ... [that] Ingraham is an OPTIONAL path for APP ... [and that] the Ingraham path remains ... [optional] even if APP numbers at Ingraham next year are lower than expected.

School Board Members:

michael.debell@seattleschools.org,
betty.patu@seattleschools.org,
peter.maier@seattleschools.org,
steve.sundquist@seattleschools.org,
sherry.carr@seattleschools.org,
kay.smith-blum@seattleschools.org,
harium.martin-morris@seattleschools.org
Here is a quick way to e-mail all the school board members at once and Cc the superintendent, CAO, Advanced Learning Manager, and APP AC co-chairs.

Update: One month later, the APP AC sent out an e-mail pointing to a draft of the transition plan (PDF). If the draft holds, APP high school will continue to be at Garfield for all APP students by default. APP students that would be entering Garfield will have the option of joining the new program at Ingraham (and, if they choose that option, but the program is too small to be viable, they will retain their place at Garfield, so there is low cost to choosing that option). The APP AC did warn that "Garfield will be very crowded the next few years ... [and] there will not be a lot of funding available to create a new program at Ingraham," but mostly good news here.

3 comments:

  1. Full, unedited APP AC e-mail is below:

    *APP Advisory Committee
    Email 34: WRITE NOW~*
    *December 8, 2010
    *
    **

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The APP AC has just sent out 2 versions, short and long, with our
    recommendations regarding changes to
    the APP high school path.

    *NOW IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO WRITE!!*

    There will be no more opportunities to provide testimony to the School Board
    and Superintendent before
    a plan is presented on January 5, so it is important for everyone to send an
    email NOW.

    Although most School Board members we've spoken with are willing to support
    the Superintendent's
    current plan of Ingraham as an *optional* path for APP, it is not definite.
    They are hoping there will be
    a certain number of APP students who commit very soon to go to
    Ingraham--otherwise
    they will
    want to impose a geographic north/south split for ease and predictability of
    student assignment.
    A GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT AT HIGH SCHOOL CANNOT HAPPEN!

    We suggest you use whatever information we've sent that resonates with you
    and your family, together
    with your own personal experiences, to craft a *BRIEF* email to your School
    Board member.
    Be sure to cc all School Board Directors, the Superintendent, CAO, Advanced
    Learning Manager,
    and the APP AC.

    From our perspective, it is most important to request
    1--that the new accelerated IB program at Ingraham is an OPTIONAL path
    for APP in high school (and state why
    without sounding entitled, keeping in mind that choice is no longer
    an option for nearly all SPS students now),
    2--that the Ingraham path remains an option even if APP numbers at
    Ingraham next year are lower than expected.
    They should not implement a geographic split if the threshold of APP
    students going to Ingraham
    is not met next year.

    School Board Members:

    michael.debell@seattleschools.org, betty.patu@seattleschools.org,
    peter.maier@seattleschools.org,
    steve.sundquist@seattleschools.org, sherry.carr@seattleschools.org,
    kay.smith-blum@seattleschools.org,
    harium.martin-morris@seattleschools.org

    Superintendent Dr. Maria Goodloe-Johnson magoodloe@seattleschools.org
    Chief Academic Officer, Dr. Susan Enfield saenfield@seattleschools.org
    Advanced Learning Manager, Dr. Robert Vaughan (2 a's),
    rcvaughan@seattleschools.org
    and the APP AC listed below

    The School Board is meeting tonight--watch on TV, Cable channel 21 at 6:00pm
    and hear what they say!!!

    Thank you!

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    *APP Advisory Committee Members 2010-11
    **Parent Members:**
    *Co-Chairs, *Stephanie Bower* stbower@comcast.net* Geeta Teredesai*
    geetaat@comcast.net
    Secretary, *Ann Owens* ann@owensavage.com
    Diversity Representative, *Roberto Jourdan* Ahero@rocketmail.com
    At-large Representative, *Rachel Miller* rmiller_seattle@hotmail.com
    Communications Representative, *Robert Njegovan* robertnappac@gmail.com
    Lowell Elementary Parent Representative, *Hilary Meyerson*
    hilarymeyerson@hotmail.com
    Thurgood Marshall Elementary Parent Representative, *Sharmila Naidu-Williams
    * sharmilanw@yahoo.com
    Washington Middle School Parent Representative, *Shannon Wheeler*
    shannonw@msn.com
    Hamilton International Middle School Parent Representative, *Kathy Tanaka*
    kathy.tanaka@att.net
    Garfield High School Parent Representative, *Mary Ann Gwinn*
    mgwinn@speakeasy.net
    *Staff Members:
    *Lowell Staff Representative,* Theresa Roth* trroth@seattleschools.org
    Thurgood Marshall Staff Representative, *Will Miller*
    wlmiller@seattleschools.org
    Washington Staff Representative, *Amy Noji* aahallett@seattleschools.org
    Hamilton Staff Representative, *Marcelyn Shadow*
    mhshadow@seattleschools.org
    Garfield Staff Representative, *Ken Courtney* kcourtney@seattleschools.org

    ReplyDelete
  2. The APP AC also sent out their recommendations for APP at Garfield. They sent out two versions, the "long version" and the "short version". Here is a copy of the short one:

    *APP Advisory Committee
    Email 32: APP Advisory Recommendations--short version*
    *December 8, 2010
    *
    **

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The APP Advisory Committee has been active over the past weeks regarding
    overcapacity at Garfield High
    School and the District's proposal to create a Gifted High School Program at
    Ingraham. After listening to
    many parents, receiving many emails, talking individually with School Board
    members, and weighing our
    own experiences with program changes over the past years, the committee has
    formulated these thoughts
    and recommendations.

    The Superintendent currently supports all current APP high school students
    remaining at Garfield if they
    choose, and the OPTION of choosing high school at Garfield or the new
    proposed program at Ingraham.
    This is important support for the APP program. The new program at Ingraham
    is a creative option that
    could benefit both APP students and enrollment at Garfield. It is important
    to advocate NOW to
    maintain Ingraham as an OPTION for APP high school students, even if
    start-up numbers are low
    next year. Supporting reasons are given in the longer email to follow.

    Our recommendations cover three areas: (I) APP High School Paths, (II)
    Garfield over-capacity, and
    (III) Long-term APP vision.
    **
    *APP High School Path RECOMMENDATIONS:*

    1. To benefit both the Garfield community and APP
    students, maintain an APP cohort
    size at Garfield of approximately 25% of the student population.

    2. Allow APP high school students to attend Garfield High School OR the
    new Gifted
    High School Program IB/AP at Ingraham based on CHOICE, not
    geographic residence.
    A) AP at Garfield and IB at Ingraham are different
    programs that meet different student needs.
    B) A geographic north/south split of APP will not achieve the
    desired enrollment for either
    Ingraham or Garfield.
    C) Current 8th graders cannot be forced into another program split at
    high school.
    D) Enroll students who WANT to be at Ingraham and Garfield in order for
    students to invest
    in their high school experience.
    E) A forced geographic split will drive students away from APP.
    3. Allow the new Ingraham program time to build APP enrollment if needed.
    4. Offer improved transportation options to Ingraham ASAP.
    5. Create and empower an effective Ingraham Design Team ASAP.

    *Garfield Over-Capacity RECOMMENDATIONS:*

    1. During this provisional period, make adjustments to school attendance
    area boundaries for all
    schools that experience over or under-capacity enrollment.
    2. Suspend or reduce the 10% open seats for all schools that are at or
    over capacity; increase
    the percentage of open seats in schools that are under-enrolled.
    3. Consider schedule changes such as adding a 7th period or 2-lunch day
    at Garfield.
    4. Consider temporary use of alternative spaces at the Student Health
    Center or other appropriate spaces

    *Long-term APP Vision RECOMMENDATIONS:*

    1. Demonstrate a clear willingness to support and invest in the creation
    of a new, successful branch
    of the APP high school path at Ingraham.
    2. Assess the impact of previous APP Splits
    3. Work with the APP community to create clearly-stated short and
    long-term plans and goals for
    the Accelerated Progress Program.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Greg, thank you for posting these emails!!! It is important!!
    Stephanie

    ReplyDelete

Ideally, parents would use their real names when commenting here but, if you don't want to, please pick a pseudonym of some kind and use it either in the "Name/URL" option or put it at the end of your comment. That makes it easier for other parents to respond to your comment.