Head of HCC/AL programs Stephen Martin is retiring from SPS this year. Speak up now to request highly qualified, appropriate replacement
Dear HCC/Spectrum and AL communities,
You may be interested to learn that the District’s Supervisor of Highly Capable and Advanced Learning programs, Stephen Martin is retiring from SPS as of 9/1/19, per a recent Personnel Report that was approved by the Board at their Feb 6, 2019 Board meeting: https://seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/18-19%20agendas/February%206/C02_20190206_Personnel%20Report.pdf
I encourage any families in the HCC/Spectrum/AL community who would like to weigh in on the new hire to contact the Board, and Supt Juneau ASAP. It looks like this is being done quite quickly and with no public input.
Write to them at: superintendent@seattleschools.org; spsdirectors@seattleschools.org, dmdebacker@seattleschools.org
The existing job description is here: https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/seattleschools/classspecs/750082?keywords=Advanced%20Learning&pagetype=classSpecifications
But missing from the listing is any requirement for experience and expertise in gifted education. Instead the focus is primarily on administrative tasks, with one reference to advanced learning.
To the best of my knowledge, Martin is the only one in the Advanced Learning Department with significant experience in gifted education. Here’s his bio: https://www.seattleschools.org/departments/advanced_learning/department_information/contact_advanced_learning/stephen_martin_bio
I have written to the Board and Supt. Juneau noting this discrepancy and have asked that the district hire a highly qualified replacement with meaningful gifted ed experience. (Letter included below.)
Regards,
Sue Peters
Request for highly qualified replacement for retiring supervisor of HCC/AL Stephen Martin
Dear Superintendent Juneau and Board Directors,
In light of the fact that Stephen Martin, the District’s Supervisor of Highly Capable and Advanced Learning programs, is retiring from SPS as of 9/1/19 (per a recent personnel report: https://seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/18-19%20agendas/February%206/C02_20190206_Personnel%20Report.pdf), I would like to take this opportunity to urge you to hire a highly qualified, appropriate replacement for him.
Currently, Mr. Martin is the only member of the Advanced Learning Department staff with significant experience and expertise in gifted education (as his bio demonstrates, included below). So it’s important that his replacement be at least equally as knowledgeable and experienced.
The candidate should also have a proven commitment to ensuring robust and appropriate programs and services that meet the academic and emotional needs of all gifted and advanced learners throughout the district, and a commitment to outreach to those who have been underrepresented in the programs.
Yet, the job listing that has been posted by SPS for Mr. Martin’s replacement makes no mention of the terms “gifted education” or “Highly Capable” among the skills, experience and education requirements of the position: https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/seattleschools/classspecs/750082?keywords=Advanced%20Learning&pagetype=classSpecifications (excerpt included below).
The position as posted doesn’t require teaching experience or familiarity with gifted ed pedagogy, nor is there any mention of experience with twice exceptional students, also a group whose needs must be understood and met by the AL Department. The position doesn't even require an MA in education, just a “closely related field.”
I hope you can agree that this description does not accurately convey the appropriate requirements for this position. So I ask that it be revised to better and fully reflect the demands of the position and the expectations of families and students of SPS, so the District will be better able to recruit the best candidate for this position.
The new hire should be someone who:
- Has a proven track record of relevant and substantial experience working with gifted children.
- Has relevant and substantial training in gifted education and programs, including programs for twice exceptional children (https://nagc.org/resources-publications/resources-parents/twice-exceptional-students), and those who are gifted in single domains, and understands asynchronous development (https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/social-emotional-issues/asynchronous-development).
- Is committed to genuine efforts to expand diversity in the program, such as expanding and simplifying referrals, investing in teacher and administrator training, and community outreach, rather than through superficial measures such as limiting private appeals (which does little to nothing to increase diverse representation in the program).
- Understands the need for gifted education and recognizes that it is part of basic education, as established by state law.
- Is committed to providing meaningful, appropriate curriculum, as prescribed by law.
In sum, I ask that the district hire a highly qualified, talented replacement, quite possibly from outside of SPS, to address the needs of the roughly 4,000 students in SPS identified as Highly Capable, and the over 8,000 students identified as Spectrum or HCC, plus the many advanced learners districtwide
Lastly, please reach out to the Highly Capable and AL communities for input. And please let me know if I can assist in this process in any way, as a past SPS Board director and member of the SPS APP/HCC community for the last 14 years.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Sue Peters
SPS & APP/HCC parent since 2005
SPS Board Director (President & VP), 2013-17
Founding Member, Parents Across America
Founding Editor, Seattle Education Blog
BIO: Stephen B. Martin, Supervisor, Highly Capable Services and Advanced Learning Programs
https://www.seattleschools.org/departments/advanced_learning/department_information/contact_advanced_learning/stephen_martin_bio
Excerpt from the current SPS job listing:
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS & ABILITIES:
Knowledge of:
- Theories and practices of Advanced Learning program education and required services
- Aptitude and achievement test measures and their interpretation
- Current research, emerging trends for the development of quality programs and the delivery of effective services
- Curricula and instructional strategies
- Effective methods for budget management and fiscal control
- Computer technology for operations management
- Practices and principles of supervision; intervention and communication strategies with parents/guardians.
Skills in:
- Budget preparation; fiscal control
- Demonstrating instructional methods
- Effective communication (listening, writing, speaking); providing timely response
- Prioritizing and meeting critical timelines
- Preparing district, state, and federal reports
- Facilitating group meetings
- Computer technology
- Data collection and analysis
- Problem solving and decision-making
- Public relations
- Evaluating the effectiveness of assigned programs
Ability to:
- Provide leadership and direction
- Work effectively and professionally with department staff, central office staff, principals, teachers, parents, and outside agencies
- Effectively represent the district before the public
- Monitor and track compliance data
- Coordinate multiple activities simultaneously
- Supervise assigned staff
- Work effectively in a multicultural community
- Minimum Qualifications
EDUCATION:
Master's degree in education or closely related field.
YEARS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE:
Three (3) years of teaching experience, including two (2) years of program management or administrative experience in an urban environment.Three (3) years of teaching experience, including two (2) years of program management or administrative experience in an urban environment.
CERTIFICATES & LICENSES:
-Valid Washington State Teaching Certificate or evidence of ability to obtain a Washington State Certificate before starting in this job.
-A valid driver' license or evidence of equivalent mobility.
PREFERRED:
Administrative Credentials.
34 comments:
Thank you so much for the heads up. I am truly disappointed, as the lack of requiring matching qualifications has to be intentional. Of course the administrator should have specialized training and background in gifted ed, as well as special ed! I am flabbergasted.
NW parent
Compare this ad from Colorado:
http://careers.nagc.org/jobs/11964306
Sidneyd
Thanks Sidneyd; that's an inspiring example. There's a lot of language in that description that SPS should use as well. Here's the full text (in two parts):
Director of Gifted Education
Colorado Department of Education
Gmail Email Print
Application
By using this feature you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Details
Posted:
February 5, 2019
Location:
Denver, Colorado
Show Map
Salary:
$84,300 -- $110,000 annually
Type:
Full Time - Experienced
Category:
Other
Preferred Education:
Doctorate
The Colorado Department of Education (CDE) seeks an experienced, dynamic, innovative educator to serve as the Director of the Office of Gifted Education within the Exceptional Student Services Unit.
Please apply no later than February 15, 2019
Major Duties and Responsibilities:
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
Provide leadership, supervision, and decision making for the Office of Gifted Education in the Exceptional Student Services Unit, including guidance for Colorado school districts in the implementation of researched-based practices for gifted students and gifted students with disabilities (twice-exceptional)
Provide leadership for the daily operations by designing systems, procedures, rules and standards that align with statute and mission of the Colorado Department of Education
Oversee and make decisions for budgets, schedules, project outcomes, staffing , federal or state grants, and future project/unit goals concerning gifted and special education program projects
Provide structure and make decisions for facilitating a regional network system that serves the needs of administrative unit directors/coordinators
Implement performance plan procedures for full-time and part-time employees according to the CDE and ESSU protocols and timeline
Serve as a liaison to the Gifted Education State Advisory Committee facilitating communication, collaborative planning with the GESAC Board, and guidance via the Office of Gifted Education/ESSU
Provide leadership for licensure, endorsement or gifted education programs at institutions of higher education; facilitate program review or regulations changes in collaboration with the Professional Services and Licensure Unit
Collaborate for development of state performance plans and technical assistance activities or network systems complying with statute and rules.
Collaborate with members of Exceptional Student Services, other CDE offices, and state agencies and organizations on behalf of gifted students and gifted students with disabilities.
Assure that the Colorado Gifted Education Review process (CGER) is implemented with practices of customer service, technical assistance, and compliance with continuous improvement/monitoring requirements
Develop problem solving methods, as needed, to determine new strategic plans, conflict resolution, and/or other opportunities for solution finding.
Provide communication with stakeholders regarding programming, unfamiliar concepts and interpretation of statute and rules; facilitate rule changes as needed
Facilitate and manage a means to provide a statewide infrastructure for the implementation of gifted and special education projects (e.g., twice exceptional), professional development (online and in-person), and a system for monitoring.
Other duties as assigned by the immediate supervisor.
(continued)
Minimum Qualifications, Substitutions, Conditions of Employment & Appeal Rights
Master's degree or higher in gifted education or a related content area/field
Colorado endorsement in Gifted Education, or if from out of state, must have appropriate credentials/certificate in gifted education
Successful experiences (3-5 years) as a leader of gifted education (LEA/SEA level)
Leadership skills that include the ability to:
work collaboratively with professional staff holding multiple perspectives,
respond appropriately and effectively in politically charged and potentially escalated contexts,
be responsive to the requests of SEA senior leadership,
facilitate improved systems and outcomes for gifted and twice-exceptional students
Experience in engaging stakeholders and collaborating with other agencies/entities
Experience in developing policies and procedures
Extensive knowledge in gifted education instructional practice and content, including social-emotional needs of gifted students
Knowledge of multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) and application to gifted education
Knowledge of Colorado's Exceptional Children's Education Act (ECEA) and regulations for gifted education
Knowledge and experience using data to inform action, professional learning, and improvements
Successful experience in developing and implementing fiscal budgets and requirements
Evidence of ongoing (personal/professional) learning in gifted education
Successful work in collaborative personnel performance systems
Strong written and verbal communication skills and presentation skills
Knowledge and skill in team building and facilitation/implementation of team work; strong facilitation skills
Evidence of experiences that involve collaboration of varied groups toward consensus building
Experience working with parent/community groups, and/or advisory groups in local districts/schools
Experience facilitating large group meetings and professional learning opportunities
Successful experience serving on district and/or state committees
Preferred
Successful state level experience (e.g., role, leading committee or advisory groups)
District or state participation in Unified Improvement Planning
Facilitator of gifted education professional learning
Extensive public speaking experience
Success in writing and obtaining grants and in project management
Knowledge of and experience in using data to inform decisions, create work plans, and evaluate return on investment
Supplemental Information
Please submit a resume, cover letter/letter of interest. Applications left blank or marked "see resume" will not be accepted.
Complete Applications must include the following documents:
• A complete online application
• A cover letter
• A resume
All materials submitted should be current and specifically address the qualifications for this position.
Internal Number: 1094
Thank you Sue so much for your continuing advocacy. I also wrote the superintendent and board in support of your letter.
LS
hum. stephen hasn't been that great... i give him 5 out of 10. his department has had three task forces under him. which were largely ignored. he unilaterally increased the private testing requirements under devin bruckner's behest. and against the psychological community he has navigated complete malpractice bosses though. but look at wms. then look at hims. how can he be quite with such inequity. every year that stephen has been in place a piece of hcs have died. did he slow that? don't know from my vantage point he is complicit.
harris better stay on top of wyeth on west seattle hs. there is sure to be a bait and switch there. and lincoln is starting to stink of excessive site based management too. but hay what should they expect with a program that is 90% white according to dewolf.
Advocating for meaningful gifted ed within SPS seems like a Sisyphean undertaking. I thank Martin for his service, and would ascribe the weakening of HCS to powers outside of his control.
I agree with the comment about "powers outside of his control". It will likely become even worse if they post that job description and hire someone without any background or experience at all. Take a moment to express your feedback to those posting this job description.
NE
Thanks to Sidneyd, we can cut and paste this job description below and ask SPS to pull from it. They don't even have to do the work to draft it; already been drafted. Please write to Juneau and the board: Don't just comment here!
http://careers.nagc.org/jobs/11964306
Concerned parent
Why isn't SPS also recruiting via the National Association for Gifted Children website, like that Colorado job Sidneyd posted? It's almost like they don't want to find someone with gifted expertise...
Does anyone have a NAGC membership that will allow them to post jobs? If so, are you willing to post a job listing that basically summarizes the Seattle listing, includes the link, and maybe also mentions what we really need? :)
Anonymous, HCC is not 90% white. For whatever reason, Director DeWolf keeps saying that.
I recommend also writing to the new Chief Academic Officer Diane DeBacker, who should be involved in the hiring process: dmdebacker@seattleschools.org
(She replaced Michael Tolley.)
Why isn't SPS also recruiting via the National Association for Gifted Children website, like that Colorado job Sidneyd posted? It's almost like they don't want to find someone with gifted expertise...
I am guessing they may have an internal candidate in mind. In addition, with the lack of specific qualifications they can pay less for the position.
NE
@NE, so whether they have an internal candidate or want to cheap out on the salary, it's like I said--it's almost like they don't want to find someone with gifted expertise.
@Anonymous Well it definitely does seem they are not seeking to find someone with relevant gifted or 2E expertise. The position as posted seems like they don't want to hire a program decision maker either or perhaps don't want to pay for someone with that experience. That happens sometimes unfortunately IMO with public sector jobs when people leave.
NE
One clarification: SPS has not listed the job yet, there is only an existing job specification. I still think personally its an excellent idea to get involved now at the start of the process.
west seattle h.s. has no experience with twice exceptional students in advanced classes. what is harris going to be doing about this?
NE2
no one at sps has experience with 2e except a few teachers and the multitude of students (many not getting services for either of their e's) and their parents. stephen martin is sympathetic. but that doesn't mean isn't going to unilaterally exclude them from the hcc with his increased testing requirements. devin bruckner's brain fart perpetrated on the board with michael tolley's bond money. followed with dewolf's racist rants. asian aren't minorities...
ALTF meeting today, Feb. 19, 4-7pm, JSCEE.
I met Martin late last year and tried to engage him in a conversation about sped students who should be accessing hcc-level curriculum. He sort of waived his hands around like "oh that" and actually said that he did not have any authority to get something done there. So now there's a generic job description which is indicating that nobody wants anybody to get anything done, except to occupy a desk.
Hand waiving too
Bingo. There's no political will down at JSCEE for serving HC students well. In fact, JSCEE's interests are best served by serving them not so well. Well enough that people don't freak out and leave, but not well enough that highly capable students learn at the pace at which they are capable, since that would only increase the gap. Best to try to slow them down a bit. Subtly, so parents don't realize it.
It'll take a sneaky genius to change things. Sneaky in that they can't let on that they really care about serving these kids well, or they won't get hired. Genius in that they'll need to come up with novel new strategies to encourage, convince, bribe, manipulate their way into making significant improvements.
sad truth
oldest 98% on SAT - 2012
next 96 on SAT - 2017
next 93 on SAT - 2019
Thanks Michael Tolley and Stephen Martin... Well done. Is Tolley a Charter head yet? How about Stephen is he headed back to Charters?
Bullwinkle
I would ask the board to look at honors for all and the effectiveness of HCC by looking historically at the HCC's SAT scores.
Where can you see SAT data for SPS programs or schools? Interested to know.
Shouldn't the SAT scores of all students be considered, as one of the reasons for HFA is to raise achievement of those who aren't or haven't been in the cohort? That said, could one year of instruction shift SAT scores? SAT scores are also correlated with family income, education prior to HS, etc. Middle school counts for a lot! SAT math just goes through Alg 2/PreCalc, and reading and language skills should be developed well before high school (darn Readers and Writers Workshop did little to help with grammar/usage instruction).
What are the SAT numbers listed above? For GHS HC? For all SPS HC identified students? HFA is NOT the only change over the last few years. A good number of north end HC students have been opting out of GHS - going to RHS/BHS, IHS, Running Start - plus there have been significant shifts in MS HC curriculum. Did the 2012 graduating cohort even use the Discovering Algebra texts, for example? And which graduating year begins the first cohort of students split from HIMS (MS LA/SS curriculum changed with the split)?
I interpreted Bullwinkle's data points as scores for their own kids who were in APP/HCC, and that the trend was going downward over time, as the program/services have seemed, to many, to have decreased in quality and rigor. (I assumed the percentages were actually percentiles.)
I agree that SAT scores of all students should be considered, but they need to be broken out separately. If one of the goals of HFA is to raise achievement (which is not exactly the same as SAT scores...) of those who were not in the cohort--and those not identified as eligible for the cohort--it's important to compare the impact on all groups separately. If, for example, non-HCC students end up getting a little higher scores on the SAT/ACT after a couple years of HFA LA and SS (compared to similar students a few years earlier when there were separate honors and GE versions), while those who came through HCC tend to do worse than their earlier peers, that would suggest the new model is boosting one group at the expense of another. Is it equitable to depress the learning of one group to improve it in another? Is it legal, given that HC students are supposed to receive enhanced/accelerated instruction?
There are oodles of data points and analyses SPS could do if they had any real interest in evaluating the effectiveness of HCC, HC services at non-HCC sites, HFA approaches, HC curricula, etc.--but they don't. Their evaluation unit is content to pay lip service to the required evaluation, throwing out a bunch of easy data that likely don't reflect the more complicated realities.
IMHO, SPS is not likely to do any better for HC students anytime soon, and they are likely to do worse.
DisAPP
One note on SAT scores - the test was redesigned sometime around 2016 and prior scores may not be as comparable. Also, with some of the recent test administrations, there has been little room at the top for any errors - 2 or 3 mistakes could drop the score a good 50 points.
google "Can the College Board Fix the August SAT to Avoid Another June Scoring Debacle?"
Yeah. My post was based on my experience under Tolley's rule. I have seen my children, who all easily qualified into app, SAT's scores decline. And yeah it could be expanded but really if you want to know the state of the program look over the last 10 years and you will see improvement followed by a steady decline.
Too bad there isn't a needs lens like there is for race.
Seriously why is race on its own a need?
Should the children of a Sup of a public school who is black get extra support? Easier access to college? Yeah they are black or even mixed race but how is that relevant when there are high SES kids of all races. I know poverty. And from my perspective it is color blind.
I also know about redlines and generational wealth. I wish the focus wasn't on the students' race but more on the educational level achieved by their parents.
Of course you are correct. However sometimes I think the focus on race, and specifically African Americans above all and to the exclusion of other races/ethnicities, is more about the optics than anything else. Nobody seems to talk about "economic privilege" (just "white privilege") which is actually always the biggest elephant in the room. In reality lower income whites and I might also add Asians as well these days are always ignored in equity discourse. Many people may have white privilege but lack economic or other privileges. They are also not as familiar to whites in Seattle who tend to be middle class or affluent and perhaps also live in a bit of a bubble. In America we also have a long history of some communities of people not being considered or treated as white (now some are but it depends on the region in the US) whose ancestors also lacked privilege and their histories are also ignored and all whites are assumed Anglo.
Let us all hope that they don't go inside and put Kari Hanson or Roger Daniels into this role. Both were proven to be Tolley and Devin Bruckner's pawns. Yuck. A real leader is needed. I give Martin a pass except for his unilateral changing testing requirement for 2e / students that need to test individually. Pass minus I guess.
We need someone with a vision, an interest in data, an interest in truly engaging parents, an ability to look at things from multiple perspectives, a true understanding of gifted ed, and, perhaps most importantly, a backbone. I agree 100% that none of the insiders are a good fit for this position.
Nita Search
Anyone know status on this?
Post a Comment