Wednesday, December 7, 2016

December '16 Open Thread

HC Advisory committee meeting schedule

Future meeting dates (all Tuesdays at 6:30 pm) include:

January 3, Jane Addams Middle School Library
February 7, Washington Middle School Library
March 7, Cascadia (Lincoln) Library
April 4, Garfield High School Library
May 2, Hamilton International Middle School Library
June 6, Madison Middle School Library

Articles


DURHAM, N.C. -- A new, comprehensive analysis of a century’s worth of research shows that grouping students by ability and providing opportunities for students to progress at a more rapid pace can increase overall student academic achievement.
The study was conducted by researchers at the Duke University Talent Identification Program (Duke TIP) and Northwestern University.
This latest study examined the equivalent of nearly 300 original research studies and found that both educational techniques work.
“After looking carefully at 100 years of research, it became clear that acceleration and most forms of ability grouping can be powerfully effective interventions,” said study co-author Matt Makel, research director at Duke TIP. “They help increase academic achievement for both lower- and higher-achieving students. 
“Moreover, these practices can yield significant academic benefits without being expensive and can even save schools money.”   

UW Robinson Center Information Session

The University of Washington's Transition School/Early Entrance Program has been providing college early entrance for students after 7th or 8th grade for over 30 years. Our program provides students with a one-year college prep program here on the UW campus before they are subsequently admitted as full undergraduates at the University. Students who thrive in our program tend to be very advanced in one or more domains, able to navigate (with help) a relatively adult world, and in need of more acceleration than K-12 can provide. We will be having an information session for this program on Thursday, December 8th on the UW campus. You can learn more about this event here: https://robinsoncenter.uw.edu/events/ts-info-session/.


We’re also hosting an all-programs information session on Saturday, December 10th from 1:30-3:30 at El Centro de la Raza in Beacon Hill. This event will cover information about our Saturday Enrichment Program, Summer Program, Online Program, Transition School and UW Academy. I have attached a flyer for this event. Interested families can register here: https://robinsoncenter.uw.edu/events/uw-academy-information-session-december/
I hope everyone has a great holiday. What's on your minds?

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

SEA Center for Race and Equity survey

I've been informed there's a survey going around inside the teacher's union from an advocacy group working on Race and Equity. One of the questions is whether to focus on ending tracking which is clearly aimed at HCC.

If you happen to be in the union and care about advanced learning please take the time to fill out the survey and advocate for the program and students within it.

Garfield PTSA notes on Honor For All

There was a discussion on "Honors for All" at the recent PTSA meeting: http://www.garfieldptsa.org/ptsa/ptsa-general-meeting-notes-11-15/

Excerpt:
"Honors for All Update - Mr. Simoneaux, npsimoneaux@seattleschools.org (History) and Mr. Zimmerman, tjzimmermann@seattleschools.org (Language Arts)

  • No plan to extend Honors for All to 10th grade
  • Same rigor and challenge as previous 9th grade honors classes 
  • Goal is to create same opportunities for all students. Very little movement into Honors or AP classes from Gen Ed students in the past
  • Teacher collaboration: same units, grade norming, support. All classes now uniform, no differences from teacher to teacher. Teachers meet Thursdays at lunch, all meet after school Fridays to collaborate 
  • History lessons all linked to AP World History standards 
  • English Language Arts writing rubric is now aligned: quarterly essays, 6 traits of writing, annotating texts 
  • First time core academic classes reflect the complete student population 
  • Don’t see much difference between HCC and Gen. Ed. students’ performance in class 
  • Complex instruction make students interdependent, working in small groups, discussions, taking on different roles  
  • Language Arts is a skill-based course, History is content-based. So pedagogical goals are different
  •  Interpersonal skills are developed, the ability to listen to others 
  • Students may feel less academic anxiety and pressure over these classes"

Check out the links for the full transcript. Again I'd be very interested if any parent's have some direct experience to add.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

11/15 Cascadia PTSA Meeting on the potential Split



The new Cascadia Elementary building layout. Note: as built even with flex spaces there are 29 rooms because of the Kindergarten wing.

Overall last night was very interesting. A lot of the staff took time to be present including Stephen Martin from Advanced Learning, Ashley Davies from Enrollment planning, someone from operations whose name I didn't catch, Jon Hafaker the Executive Director for the region and Rick Burke from the school board. Also, the format with the PTSA asking a series of pre-selected questions covered a lot of ground in an hour which I think was a wise use of time.

What follows are my notes (pardon the lack of organization)

  • The PTSA will follow Cascadia if a split occurs and a new one will have to be formed. Any reserves left will probably be split in a pro-rated fashion based off the school sizes.
  • On that note, the current drive is 100,000 behind target. So if you're able to, please give if you haven't already. 
  • The top choice off the surveys was to geosplit by between 40-60% between the 2 versions.
  • The district's decision remains unchanged and it will recommend the split at the operations meeting. This will come up for a Jan 4th vote.
  • Why rush?  Ashley didn't add any new color to the question but did add this was a typical timeframe (6 mo) for starting a new school up.
  • The staff are using the survey results to partly justify the choice now as well.
  • There was no desire from either community to merge with Thornton Creek and run both buildings as a single unit so that is off the table for now.
  • There was no data on the relative costs of portables vs. running the Decatur building.
  • If the levy cliff occurs the district will be in a 71 million dollar deficit and that limits the budgetary planning here i.e.  don't expect mitigation funds and rather look forward to staff cuts.
  • There was a promise to involve parents in any principal selection which would probably occur right in January. Based on the timelines I assume this would be a fairly rapid process.
  • The feeling from the staff was that the logistical challenges on the Wilson Pacific site with as many as 2000 kids were greater than 900 on the Thornton Creek one.  Different starting times was mentioned as one obvious adjustment.
  • The split will be done by middle school attendance area. All of the Eckstein feeder schools which makes about 240-260 kids would go to Decatur.
  • Dir. Peters has introduced an amendment to alter this and make the new site an option. Although its hard to predict all the implications of such a change.  This would allow a cap on enrollment but also make planning more unknown  and potentially lead to under enrollment or unbalanced enrollment per grade.  
  • The staff considers the Decatur site a permanent rather than temporary solution unlike the portables. Of course, everything is subject to change if enough growth continues to occur.
  • The teachers split would be governed by the collective bargaining agreement. Essentially, the teachers get to volunteer first and then its done by seniority and category.
  • There is no answer on money for the initial gym and library although the staff wants to provide that due to equity. 
  • The physical plant is currently being seismically upgraded and will recieve new paint and carpeting. In addition, the plan is to tear down the annex and develop a new playground there. This like all the other question depends on available money.
  •  Several rumors were mentioned (black mold, condemned building) and  called out as false.

The bottom line is that while there are more details here we're still on the same path. Budgetary and space constraints really limit the choices. The staff wants to do the split. The board sounds like its considering holding off a year. And if we do kick the can down the road there is still some risk that even the Decatur site will be spoken for by that time.


Friday, November 4, 2016

November '16 Open Thread

Now we're 2 months into the school year, how are things going?  I'm especially interested in hearing from those at Thurgood Marshall and Garfield H.S.


An interesting piece of data from the district on potential portables per school site:
http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=15678264


Robert Eaglestaff planning Meetings:
http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/one.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=12627790

Coming soon: Robert Eagle Staff MS Community Meetings-Beginning in November 2016
Posted on 09/08/2016
Robert Eagle Staff Middle School
Upcoming community meetings where you can join Principal Campbell and the Robert Eagle Staff Middle School community to learn about the new school, share your ideas, and celebrate learning.
Interpreters provided: please contactmacampbell@seattleschools.org
November 17, 2016, 6:30 p.m.Meet Ms. Campbell at the Daniel Bagley Elementary PTSA meeting
November 22, 2016, 6 - 7:30 p.m.
Broadview Branch Library (12755 Greenwood Ave. N.) 

Robert Eagle Staff Middle School Family and Community Planning Meeting  
November 29, 2016, 6 - 7:30 p.m.
Loyal Heights Elementary at Marshall (520 NE Ravenna Blvd)

Robert Eagle Staff Middle School Family and Community Planning Meeting
December 3, 2016, 11 a.m. - 12:30 p.m
Location TBD
Robert Eagle Staff Middle School Family and Community Planning Meeting
December 8, 2016, 6 - 7:30 p.m.
Loyal Heights Elementary at Marshall (520 NE Ravenna Blvd)

Robert Eagle Staff Middle School Family and Community Planning Meeting
January 5, 2017, 6 - 7:30 p.m.
Broadview Branch Library (12755 Greenwood Ave. N.) 
 Robert Eagle Staff Middle School Family and Community Planning Meeting

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Cascadia Split Briefing Paper

The Friday memo from last week contained the most official explanation of what the staff is thinking about the split.

http://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/Friday%20Memos/2016-17/Oct%2014/20161014_FridayMemo_CascadiaSplit_BriefingPaper.pdf

[As an aside: I was really glad to see this published. This represents a significant step forward in terms of transparency  for the central staff]

You can read the whole paper which is interesting but I wanted to dig into a few key parts. First
a look at the enrollment information.
















  • As can be seen in 2012-13 when the planning process occurred the number were not too out of whack for a 650 capacity building and it wasn't until last year that tipping point occurred.
  • Enrollment stayed basically steady this year BUT the largest grade is 3rd. There are small drops in 1st and 2nd as well as 5th.   5th grade doesn't matter much for future projections. The key question is how many more kids will join below 3rd?  Are the 3rd and 4th grades anomalies or will the cohorts behind them end up as large?
  • Note: also uncertainty as to the program location and overcrowding may depress numbers. On the other hand, a split may also affect numbers in either direction depending on how attractive it looks to prospective families.

District Wide Enrollment Data for comparison.  Cohort sizes continue to increase :







Also interesting from this data is the current teacher/student ratios and the class size reduction targets which are supposed to be fully implemented in 2018.  To put this in context Cascadia has always had the highest ratios in the district i.e. the most crowded classrooms. 

1st  - 3 homerooms 21:1     vs. WA state target 17 
2rd - 6 homerooms 21:1     vs. WA state target  17
3rd - 8 homerooms 24:1     vs. WA state target  17
4rd - 7 homerooms 27:1     vs. WA state target  25
5rd - 6 homerooms 28:1     vs. WA state target  25

Capacity (details to be confirmed):

  • Current plans show 27 homerooms in the Cascadia building. So we start with a deficit of 3. 
  • According to the document the maximum portables on the site is only 4 a reduction from the previous number reported (What happened to the other 2?). 

Official Analysis of the site:


None of the stated reasons is completely compelling.

  • The MUP is not binding. The district routinely exceeds them in other buildings and the capacity is changed as portables are added.
  • The gym situation is no worse than the current one at Lincoln and probably a bit better.
  • The long term capacity issue doesn't mandate immediate action. Is this an emergency next year?
  • Fully utilizing buildings like Decatur seems neither here nor there.

However, the two biggest problems remain unanswered:

  • The core space is only for 660. With 4 portables would the school fit all the students for even 1 year?  We won't completely know the true enrollment numbers until this spring.
  • Are there any portables available given the other needs in the district and can the district afford them? Its quite possible there are cost savings to the split.  You balance the extra staff  needed vs. the portable costs and the additional state funds for lower class sizes that the split would earn.
And finally even if the we could wedge all the kids in next year if they won't fit within 1-2 years more should the district be proactive now or delay? The biggest risk of delaying is that the options may be much worse by then. There are alternate proposals for all the buildings being discussed. Its entirely imaginable they could all be claimed.

Sunday, October 9, 2016

October '16 Open Thread

Brain Power Event at UW Robinson Center

"On Sunday, October 30, the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth and the University of Washington Robinson Center are co-sponsoring a one-day event featuring fun, hands-on learning opportunities for academically advanced students and engaging discussions for parents and educators about pressing issues in gifted education ranging from curriculum to college readiness to the unique challenges faced by advanced learners.
This event is designed for academically advanced students in kindergarten through 12th grade and their families, and educators of all backgrounds. Join us for this opportunity to hear from leaders in the field of gifted education and to learn more about helping your child shine.  
Space is limited. RSVP
CTY Talent Search
Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth"

What the end state of Equity looks like in San Francisco


http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-responds-to-parents-in-algebra-10415538.php

"San Francisco’s mayor, spurred by city supervisors, has sided with parents in a math war waged against the school district, setting aside city money to help motivated students accelerate through Algebra 1, officials said Wednesday.
The school district’s current sequence of math courses makes Algebra 1 a ninth-grade course, even though private schools and many other public school districts offer students the option of taking algebra in middle school, putting them on a track to take calculus senior year.
Frustrated parents have accused the district of dumbing down math, leaving advanced students bored and behind their peers enrolled elsewhere. Parents petitioned the district last year, submitting more than 1,000 signatures to restore Algebra I to the middle school curriculum."

What's on your minds?

Monday, October 3, 2016

October 5th Board Work Session on Advanced Learning

This Wednesday the board of directors will having a working session on Advanced Learning:

Calendar Item: http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=20423&contextId.13771=101256&parentId.13771=101257&returnTo=101257&objectId.13771=11474270&currentDate=2016-10-04&view=event
Agenda Location: https://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=15426

Updated Official Agenda:

  • Work Session: Advanced Learning 5:30pm* 
  •  Mission 
  •  Excerpts from ‘Equity’ Policy 0030 & HCC/Advanced Learning Policy 2190 
  • Research 
  • MTSS 
  • Enrollment/Testing/Notification 
  • Data 
  • Discussion
If you follow the agenda link above, there is some racial demographic data at the end of the slides.



This is both an opportunity and a risk given the current climate and the as always tepid support for the program. In advance of the meeting I thought I'd set out a framework of areas that I'd like to see the board consider:

  • Goals - What is the purpose of our HCC program within the context of what the state law mandates?  Do we have multiple populations we want to reach with different needs? Does highly capable mean intrinsic ability or current achievement levels?
  • Testing And Identification - How can we simplify and improve the current process? Can we do universal screening? Can we return to testing in school?
  • Curriculum - How can we find funds and a structure to make this a reality? If its not possible what do we see the program offering? What do the current participants think at the various grade levels?
  • Delivery Models  - What does the research say is most effective? 
  • Governance structure - What can we change in the way the entire program is run to more effectively improve it?
I'd like to open this up to everyone else's ideas. What do you think should be discussed and what directions do you want the program to go?




Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Cascadia Capacity Scenarios

I'm going to try to assemble all the data, pros and cons of the various scenarios here. I'll add on whatever we find out. There are lots of hard choices to be made here unfortunately and some of them affect other groups in the district.

Official SPS Link http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=13505264

"Seattle Public Schools is excited to open three schools at the Wilson-Pacific site in 2017-18, Cascadia Elementary, Robert Eagle Staff Middle School, and Licton Springs K-8. Cascadia is temporarily located in the former Lincoln High School building with Licton Springs K-8 and serves students in the Highly Capable Cohort.
Cascadia’s new building is planned to have a capacity of approximately 660 seats, which is not sufficient to serve all of the students currently at Cascadia given the growth the school has experienced.
The district is reviewing potential options for serving all of the current and future students who will attend Cascadia. Representatives from Capital, Enrollment Planning, School Operations, Advanced Learning, and School Supports have met to discuss potential options given available building space across the district and the capacity challenges across the district.
The District’s Capacity Management Task Force will be discussing this topic at its next meeting on September 14, 2016, 12-1:30 p.m. and there will be additional community meetings to review and share possible options for meeting the needs of the current and future Highly Capable identified students and their families.
Decisions on an additional site to accommodate all of the students at Cascadia will be made prior to Open Enrollment, which begins in mid-February 2017. The district currently anticipates the following timeline for Board review on this decision.
Board Timeline:
November 17, 2016: Board Action Report presented at Operations Committee. 
December 7, 2016: Board Action Report presented to Board for Introduction.
January 4, 2016: Board Action Report presented to Board for Action."

Currently Cascadia has an enrollment of 750 (30 homerooms) and its projected to grow into the 800's.

Growth: 5 year growth projections
Heat Map: Eligible MapEnrolled Map  (About 120 are eligible but not enrolled in the NE)

Status Quo

Cascadia was built with a capacity of 660 under the old classroom size standards and 550 under the new ones. It has space for 6 portables. The current cohorts are largest in 3rd grade (8 home rooms). If this continues there will need to be at least 2-4 more classrooms even at current student/teacher ratios.

Total Seats (assuming 25/portable):  810 or 700. This assumes no portables are needed for the other programs on the site.

Cons:  Strain on core facilities including child care spaces, bathrooms, lunch room, playground similar to at Lincoln but in a much smaller building.  Also if a split occurs, the classroom sizes at Cascadia will be smaller and some of the special-ed flex spaces will be used as intended rather than as classrooms. This may be a significant improvement in the educational experience for many students especially 2e ones.

Blue prints: http://bex.seattleschools.org/assets/Uploads/documents/131028-WPEMS-SDAT-08.pdf
(look towards the end of the slide deck)
Note: Rina has said there are 27 homerooms currently designed in the new building.


Most of my thinking is predicated around the assumption that the number of students will totally overrun this site and a split will happen no matter what so we need to find the most orderly least-worst alternative.

That said, starting a new program in a building is hard and requires a lot of parent effort to create all the supports that exist in the current ones, like after school programs, a PTA, muscial instrument instruction etc.  For reference our smallest HCC site at Fairmount Park has about 164 students but the recommended cohorts size is 2 classes per grade.

Cohousing has its own separate issues with integrating populations and sharing resources.

Decatur Building

This is the official staff preferred alternative. Originally the proposal was to move 150 students over
to the site.

History:  http://www.historylink.org/File/10497   "Stephen Decatur Elementary School opened in September 1961 with a K-5 enrollment of 326."  Note despite rumors it appears to not have been built as a K-2. 

Location:

Homerooms: 13-15 Its unclear if the 15 includes the library or not. Bear in mind at least 2 rooms need to be used for PCP (art/music) and a special ed resource room.
Condition2014 Assessment (See page: 716)   There are a set of improvements like replacing windows/door/sprinkler systems that are recommended. I can't find any evidence of it ever being condemned but given that money has continually been invested that's probably a moot point.
Capacity:  At 20-25 per room somewhere around the 200's.
Staffing: At this size:   .5 secretary. .5 librarian, .2 nurse etc.  (see: WSS formulas on page 30
Principal: Could this be run by John Miner (principal of Thornton Creek) jointly? That would raise the school size and allow pooling of resources like the nurse or library.
Neighborhood Opposition: I'd expect a fair amount given the previous resistance to building the new Thornton Creek building and how this would drive traffic and students on the site up even higher.
Limited Expansion: I have to confirm this but I doubt any portables can be added to the site.

Cedar Park/Olympic Hills


Either of these two buildings have been floated as possibilities in the past. Last June I asked if they were still on the table and was told no. As currently configured the extra space exists at the Olympic Hills site. This could easily be shifted to Cedar Park depending on how you draw the attendance zones. 

Note: The NNE community is concerned about the current Cedar Park catchment zone since it draws a mostly FRL population and are pushing for the district to reconsider it.

Capacity: 300 seats are unused. Cedar Park has space for around 340 officially but  that requires 8 portables. It appears to have about 12 homerooms from the blue prints. 
Busing: Either building is in the far NE corner of the city and less centrally located.  This somewhat mitigated by pulling students only from the Eckstein or JAMS reference area.
Facilities: Cedar Park is a landmarked building and is being renovated without a dedicated library: http://bex.seattleschools.org/bex-iv/cedar-park/.  Olympic Hills is bigger and more full featured. Either one is going to be in better condition than the Decatur building.
Long Term Viability: This would likely not be a stable scenario at Olympic Hills given rising school age populations in the reference zone. There's a good chance of another migration within a few years. Cedar Park probably has more viability.

Thurgood Marshall

I've heard scenarios floated with Queen Anne and Magnolia being switched to Thurgood Marshall.
Capacity: May 2016 enrollment: 516.    Official SPS Capacity: 534   

So this is realistically only possible if you added portables on the site or shifted students. The building is essentially full.

Madrona

This is the back to the future alternative since the program was housed there from the 1970's through 1997.

Capacity:   Enrollment May 2016 (294)  Official SPS Capacity: 352. This cap limit one seems off based on historical population at the school which has been around 450 without portables.

Cons:  Any move of the north end population will likely depress enrollment based on how the program grew when moved closer.  Not even on the official table.


Other Capacity Adjustments to decrease population size:

  • Serve only 3-5 in self-contained classrooms.
  • Tighten requirements. This usually tends to cut against efforts to increase diversity.
  • Provide a compelling alternative on site in the reference area schools like what Spectrum  provided.  Some quick practical considerations: the district just worked hard to dismantle self contained Spectrum classrooms so this would represent a huge reversal. That doesn't make it impossible but all the institutional pressure against is still there. Secondly, I'm not sure if  space exists given the rising enrollments to exactly recreate the old system. Its also unlikely families would transfer back in such cases vs. less families joining initially.  So it would take longer to alleviate the immediate Cascadia issues.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

2016 National Merit Semifinaists

The Seattle Times put out a story today with the semifinalists for 2016:  http://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/bellevues-interlake-high-tops-this-years-list-of-national-merit-semifinalists/

"Bellevue’s Interlake High School again topped the list of National Merit Scholarship program semifinalists this year, with 47 students out of nearly 400 seniors across the state who will have the opportunity to compete for big academic scholarships next spring.
The second-highest number was at Lakeside School in Seattle, with 28 qualifying students this year, followed by Skyline in Sammamish with 16 students. The semifinalists’ names were released Wednesday."

Selected Seattle H.S. Stats for this year and last:

Garfield: 10   (7)
Ingraham: 11 (6)
Roosevelt: 8  (1)



Friday, September 9, 2016

SENG Class coming up next Month

I was forwarded this info which may of interest to some of you:




Come join us for an interactive and inspiring workshop where you will learn key tools to help your gifted family thrive. This one-day workshop will apply SENG concepts at a deeper level focusing on the whole family. Specific tools include: 1) measuring certain gifted traits in family members, 2) examining how different patterns can cause ongoing conflicts and misunderstandings and 3) identifying some strategies to help address those challenges. Participants will leave with uniquely crafted strategies to help their family live together in a more cohesive and harmonious manner.

Date: Saturday, October 8, 2016
Time: 9:00 am – 5:00 pm
Location: The Good Shepherd Center, 4649 Sunnyside Avenue North, Room 202, Seattle, WA 98103
Cost: $175 for 1 parent, $245 for both parents
                                                
Presenters: Anne van Roden and Gloria Sandford – both experienced parents of gifted children and licensed mental health professionals who specialize in  working with gifted families in the Seattle area.

Space is Limited to 40 Adults!


Wednesday, August 31, 2016

September '16 Open Thread

Over the past few weeks I've watched a stream of back to school photos across my facebook feed from various friends in other districts.  And here we are with still a week to go before school commences.  But there are signs of spin up. The practice bus runs are occurring in the morning. Transportation letters have gone out. Teacher assignments are also starting to appear.

Update from Dir. Sue Peters:


"I've needed to reschedule it [the next community meeting] to Sunday Sept 11, 1-3 pm at Magnolia Library (instead of Sept 3).
In the meantime, if anyone on your blog, from the HCC community or beyond, would like to share any questions, concerns or feedback about the Garfield and Thurgood Marshall plans for Honors and Social Studies (or any other topic, of course), please invite them to send them my way, and to my colleagues on the Board:
SPSDirectors@seattleschools.org = Board Directors only
or

SchoolBoard@seattleschools.org = Board, plus Superintendent, and 7 members of seniors staff.

Hope you've had a nice summer."

Cascadia Split Update

From this weeks Friday Memo more indications that a split is being planned.
"- Cascadia enrollment for Highly Capable will be going to the capacity management task force soon; with the goal of bringing a solution to the board in November. Cascadia (new) is built for 660. Decatur (being vacated by Thornton Creek) can serve 275 – making a total of 935. Current enrollment is 770 and we are growing at close to 10% per year = 840. "
The next Capacity Management Task Force meeting is on the 14th so there may be more news soon.
See: http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=11000118

Note: Given the WSS staffing formula See page 30 in: http://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/16-17agendas/09_10_2016/20160910_Agenda_Retreat_Packet.pdf  A split school would have only .5 secretary. .5 librarian, .2 nurse etc.

Official SPS statement:.
http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=13505264

Articles about the First Day

By coincidence I saw 2 different articles on what to teach on the first day. The first was from one of my favorite teacher bloggers Fawn Nguyen: http://fawnnguyen.com/first-two-days-school/ She's one of those people I wish my kids could have in real life:

"Oh, how many of you have older siblings who had me as their teacher? Yeah? Did they say that I’m really mean? Well, your sister is a liar"
"If you’re reading this it’s probably too late. There’s a good chance the teacher of a child you love has already squandered a non-trivial amount of instruction time by prodding a roomful of reluctant kids through a series of awkward icebreakers and/or delivering a soul-crushingly dull and dour recitation of required supplies, class rules, and tardy policies."

Upcoming Threads:

  • I'll setup a testing thread earlier this year based on what I saw last time around. Note: the testing registration deadline as always is quite soon:  October 6th. See: http://www.seattleschools.org/students/academics/advanced_learning/ for more deadlines
  • Since I thought the first version was interesting we'll have a building news thread maybe once a season.
  • I plan to check in with TM and Garfield to see how things are going after enough time has gone by to judge.
Info on commenting

So how's it going in those last days and as school starts please post your impressions of the new year.




Monday, August 29, 2016

Editorial: Where is the Program Going?



Those of us defending Advanced  Learning never have much of a respite. There's a historical trend of egalitarianism that pushes back against any attempt to differentiate learning. Of late its coming from those concerned primarily with race and equity with changes at Thurgood Marshall and Garfield. To summarize, the various charges leveled against the program:

  • The demographics don't match that of the general district.
  • These represent bias in the testing and identification process.
  • The presence of any self-contained, tracked program hurts those not within it which is disproportionately students of color regardless of the fairness of the identification process.
  • The program is merely a modern day form of segregation and its participants are actively or unwittingly racist.
So is providing acceleration and enrichment unethical? I think the answer here is contained even within the district's goals  "Seattle Public Schools is committed to ensuring equitable access, closing the opportunity gaps and excellence in education for every student." For the advanced learning community,  excellence in education for every student remains an elusive goal and is what motivates most of the parents.  Families are searching for appropriately challenging curriculum and opportunities for their children.

Unfortunately,  we are also cast because of the moment  into the role of defending an imperfect system. Seattle Public is a big complicated district that has much room to grow in almost every area. However, the good should not be the enemy of the perfect. Critics have seized on flaws to suggest we should throw the entire system out rather than pushing to correct them or even recognizing where improvements are occurring.

So, I will start by saying that the AL office has done a historically poor job of reaching out to minority and low income families even within the bounds of what the law allows. They often have patted themselves on the back for producing brochures in several languages and refused to acknowledge how the chaotic process of identification itself creates barriers for families. The department does not really collaborate with parents so the periodically offered suggestions on improving the process from the community haven't gone far.  One positive step has been the push for universal screening in the south east quadrant. This has apparently borne some fruit according to the statistics from the department. (30% of the population are students of color and underrepresented population have been growing by 18% a year in the program)  Most people I believe support efforts to reduce barriers here and we have to see improvements made before we can judge how much of an effect they have on demographics. Secondly, I think a lot of the criticism ignores the presence of minorities already in the program and the heavy recruitment of them by programs like Rainier Scholars out of the public system.

Testing is a very imperfect science and I tend to prefer looser systems myself for that reason. Its better to admit more students and risk false positives than restrict and shut kids out from the curriculum they would benefit from.  However, the actual tests used for identification are in use across the country and not fundamentally flawed as some assert. The programs select for a population that achieves in the upper percentiles on tests and all the standardized testing shows that is how the students continue to perform.  A lot of the critics deny this fact and fundamentally believes there are no difference in the students that requires a different curriculum.

Its also important to realize once this selection process is finished, the district concentrates the kids in a few schools.  That distorts all discussion of demographics at such sites. Its not surprising that there are lots of white students in honors or AP classes at Garfield, since we funneled all our high performing ones there from a much larger geographic area.

Moving on, tracking is a complex subject. There is a fairly large body of research both for and against it. See: http://discussapp.blogspot.com/p/i-was-forwarded-some-links-to-articles.html.   My general position which I've stated before, is that when a different curriculum is needed, tracking is generally appropriate.  Its ineffective to try to teach large numbers of students completely different lessons at the same time.  Given an impossible task, the classroom by default will regress to the mean. This is generally why families have left their neighborhood schools in the first place. Its often not that there is no differentiation there, its that its proven insufficient because of the gap between children. On top of that the home classrooms are sometimes unable to provide the social emotional supports or peer group that certain kids need to be successful

Sometimes, again because its an imperfect system, we're left with the district claiming the tracks are teaching the same material. There are two responses to that, where there is no true distinction tracking does lose its rational. Often, however, this situation is artificial. The same district has diluted or forced the curriculum into the same pathway against the complaints of the community. The proper action here is to create a class that is actually different.

Finally, are we as a group stubbornly resistant to change? First we are not monolithic. The advanced learning community has just as broad a spread of opinions as the general population.  Speaking for myself, I'd say we're looking for the following out of the district:

  • Inclusion in any process.
  • Healthy two way communication .
  • Consideration of quality and the needs of the students within the program. 
  • Systems to measure the health of the program and signs on the ground that we're moving in the right directions.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

August Curriculum and Instruction Board Committee Meeting

Monday was the latest C&I  meeting. At the end, members discussed the revisions to the Advanced Learning Procedure (2190).  This included the  language to allow Thurgood Marshall to implement blended Social Studies.

Agenda:

http://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/School%20Board/committees/C&I/2016-17/8.15.16_C&I_Packet.pdf

Previous Post on the subject:

http://discussapp.blogspot.com/2016/07/advanced-learning-is-looking-for.html

Official minutes will not be published until next month but from what I heard, the edited procedure was adopted with a set of concerns raised. There will be a followup board work session on October 5th regarding advanced learning and some of the larger philosophical issues.

Reactions


"Dear Thurgood Marshall Community:
Last night the School Board Curriculum Committee met to discuss changes to the Advanced Learning policy including a suggested change that would allow us to apply for a social studies waiver so that we can blend students from our various programs to learn together. Because the current policy states that Highly Capable students will be taught math, writing, reading, social studies and science in a self-contained setting, this has been a subject of much discussion and some contention. I am so happy to let you know that with much support from district central office leadership and from all of you, we have received approval to apply for our waiver!
School Board Directors Burke, Harris and Geary asked me to pass on their appreciation to our staff for their hard work and innovation on behalf of our students. They were clear that while innovation must be balanced with oversight, they did not want to stand in the way of a creative new approach that we know will benefit our students. I want to thank all of you for your involvement in this process. The social studies plan was truly a grassroots effort, begun by our Equity Team and taken up by our staff and parents. It is the positive beliefs and thoughtfulness of our staff, as well as the supportive efforts of our parents that made this a reality.
Of course, this is just the beginning! Other schools have been watching our journey to get to this place. Superintendent Dr. Nyland has repeatedly stated that closing the achievement gap is THE educational issue of our time. As we begin this work of coordinating our efforts to educate our diverse students body about social studies and to teach them the skills that will allow them to live and work successfully in a diverse community, our progress will be watched by our parents, the district, the board and others who might also want to consider changes to the ways they deliver instruction to create more equitable learning environments. We will approach this work carefully and thoughtfully, keeping and eye towards evaluation of our efforts. This is exciting work we are embarking on!

I look forward to seeing you and your children in just 3 short weeks. I’m excited to start our next year together!

Best,
Katie May, Principal
Thurgood Marshall Elementary"

Principal  May: 
I am writing this from my personal email because I cannot get on to the new Outlook system other than through my IPhone.  
I am going to be posting this to the Seattle Schools Community Schools forum blog to clarify my position about remarks attributed to me transferred from a letter from you [Principal May]  to your school that was posted on the blog from the "results" of Monday's (C&I) Curriculum & Instruction meeting. 
 I also wanted to give you the heads up that I have asked General Counsel Noel Treat to research whether or not the proposed Supt. Policy violates or conflicts with the current HCC / AL Policies that allows for a waiver for Thurgood Marshall to blend Social Studies and HCC classes.  I believe other Directors also have concerns.   
I strongly believe that this SPS SP waiver procedure is not clear and is in violation of our current policies.  Though Superintendent Procedures do not have be passed by the Board, they do need to be in synch with current policies.  If the policy is poorly written and confusing and (out of date e.g.,Spectrum and ALO) (as I believe it is) then the policie(s) should be changed and vetted.    The Board has a Committee of the Whole to address Advanced Learning on October 5th.    
I absolutely have enormous respect for our teachers at Thurgood Marshall and others in other communities who are attempting to bring forth creative changes, e.g., Garfield Honors for All in the 9th Grade, Chief Sealth a number of years ago, etc. 
 I do though as an elected Boardmember have a duty to uphold policies, attempt to change them or make them more clear, not to ignore them.  Notice of these proposed changes doesn't appear on the Board's radar until well into the process and that's distressing because then the communication, such as it is, becomes polarized and good intent is lost.  Our waiver policy for curriculum is also not clear, nor is enforcement of same, or of the involvement and counsel of BLTs in any such decisions clearly articulated.  And, the BLT process throughout the district is not consistent.  
My hope is that on Oct. 5th and before and after, we address issues such as identification processes for advanced learning and highly capable opportunities for previously unidentified children, especially those children of color and low SES; whether or not we need and should mandate differentiation professional development training in our increasingly crowded classrooms to be able to meet an even wider population of learning needs; and, where the 25-30% of Seattle's children who have chosen other educational resources are and why - have they given up and lost faith in SPS to meet their children's needs?  
That does NOT mean that I think policies and waivers done without a consistent mechanism in place and without robust engagement and notice to our families is acceptable.  I feel often that we have not identified what part of our process is "site-based management" and what accountability layers are in place or need review and examination, e.g.,  where do the Executive Directors fit in this pattern?  How do the different departments and Exs., Chiefs, and Supts. fit in?   I used to tease former Director Shauna Heath - that we should set the table for 98 other places so every school can do what it likes or needs.  The evaluation process/measurement of changes of narrowing the opportunity gap has to be looked at as well.  What has worked in the past?  What did the U of VA. study say that SPS paid big money for?   
I am in absolute favor of meeting all of the learning needs of our children.  How to do that, I believe deserves very intense and thorough review for unintended consequences and should be approached in a systemic and thoughtful manner - taking into account the hard work and opinions of our teachers who toil every day.  
Most cordially,
Leslie Harris
SPS Director, Dist. 6
206-475-1000
Exec., A&F Committees



Commenting:

I've now cut over to disqus comments.
  1. To comment as a guest , start to sign in and then click on the check box titled:  "I'd rather post as a guest"
  2.  This box is only visible on mobile platforms after you start to fill the text boxes out.
  3. An email is required but not verified so if you're concerned about privacy you may make one up. That said, I'd prefer that you provide a valid one. This will only be visible to me and allow me to privately followup on a comment.
  4. Please email me directly using the contact us button on the main page if you run into any issues and can't comment.
  5. Comments by new guest posters will tend to go into moderation until whitelisted.
  6. Social media accounts can be used to authenticate but are not required. 
  7. The privacy and cookie policies for disqus are on their site. I don't believe there is any difference with respect to privacy if you choose to guest post and there is not much difference for an authenticated comment on blogger versus an authenticated comment on disqus.





Tuesday, August 16, 2016

2016 SBAC Results Released

District OSPI Data:

http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/TemplateDetail.aspx?domain=SBAC&schoolId=100&reportLevel=District&year=2015-16&gradeLevelId=7&groupLevel=District&waslCategory=1&chartType=1&yrs=2015-16



  • Opt out rates appear to be up but not by a lot since last year.
  • Ceilings are a bit higher.
  • The previous version of this data was used by Shauna Heath's in board meetings last year to suggest that the cohort model was ineffective.

Commenting:

I've now cut over to disqus comments.  
  1. To comment as a guest , start to sign in and then click on the check box titled:  "I'd rather post as a guest"
  2.  This box is only visible on mobile platforms after you start to fill the text boxes out.
  3. An email is required but not verified so if you're concerned about privacy you may make one up. That said, I'd prefer that you provide a valid one. This will only be visible to me and allow me to privately followup on a comment.
  4. Please email me directly using the contact us button on the main page if you run into any issues and can't comment.
  5. Comments by new guest posters will tend to go into moderation until whitelisted.
  6. Social media accounts can be used to authenticate but are not required. 
  7. The privacy and cookie policies for disqus are on their site. I don't believe there is any difference with respect to privacy if you choose to guest post and there is not much difference for an authenticated comment on blogger versus an authenticated comment on disqus.






Monday, August 1, 2016

August '16 Open Thread

As hard as it is to believe, the new school year is starting to creep up on us. If anyone has any info on school supplies lists/get togethers etc. they want to share please either post it here or forward it to me.

I'm going to put a plug out for Shakspeare in the Park: http://greenstage.org/shakespeare-in-the-park/
The productions are one of my favorite parts of summer and a fun way to introduce kids to Shakespeare.

I'm also getting close to trying out the new commenting system. See: http://discussapp.blogspot.com/2016/07/july-open-thread.html. I'd still like more folks to give it a try and provide feedback before I move to a more extensive roll out.


WAC changes

I made an inquiry and heard back from OSPI

"While there is a requirement for federally-funded programs (such as Title I) to provide services to approved private schools, there is no such requirement for Highly Capable Programs.   RCW 28A.150.220, Basic Education, speaks to what districts are to provide for "students enrolled in grades one through twelve..."  

Some districts choose to include private and homeschooled students in their identification process.  However, students not enrolled in the district do not generate Highly Capable apportionment.  The district's responsibility under Basic Education is to provide for enrolled students."

But Status Quo remains for Seattle

"We have always tested non-enrolled residents of Seattle during our annual identification process. Since they are not covered under the HCP grant funds, we charge $140 to help defray some of the costs of identifying such students."

Math For Love

I just received the summer newsletter from Math For Love.  Two items seemed of interest.

  • Math for Love Sunday classes start October 2. Sign up here!
  • Math in Seattle: Evelyn Lamb on Visualizing Hyperbolic Geometry5pmAugust 22 at the UW.


What's on your minds?

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Advanced Learning is looking for Feedback on Procedure Change

"The Advanced Learning office has been soliciting community comment regarding proposed revisions to Superintendent Procedure 2190SP, Seattle Public Schools Highly Capable Services and Advanced Learning. Read the superintendent procedure.pdf icon
Comments on the proposed DRAFT can be sent to advlearn@seattleschools.org with the subject line 2190SP. 
The proposed DRAFT will be reviewed by the Curriculum and Instruction Policy Committee at their meeting on Monday, August 15, 2017. Please send your comments in before July 31 to assure it will be reviewed prior to the meeting."
http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=11749302

The most substantive changes here are related to Thurgood Marshall and blended Social Studies.



Sunday, July 10, 2016

Garfield Honors For All FAQ

The Garfield PTSA kindly provided a copy of the latest mailing to us:

Garfield High School
400 23rd Ave
Seattle, WA 98122
Tel: (206) 252-2270
Fax: (206) 252-2271
www.ghs.seattleschools.org


Garfield 9th Grade Honors for All FAQ


Summer 2016


Exactly what is the change?

● All ninth-grade language arts and social studies classes will be honors level.

● This change eliminates the division between the previous "regular" and "honors" tracks.

● The recent Seattle Times article about Garfield used the phrase "cut honors history and English," which is an unfortunate misrepresentation of our plan.


When is this change happening?

● The new honors for all class begins this fall, for the 2016-17 school year


Why are we making this change right now?

● We are making the change to address the opportunity gap for all incoming students, allowing them all access to honors in order to promote equity at Garfield High School.

● Because we are already differentiating for a wide variety of learners, it is simply an extension of our current methodology.


Is special training required for teachers to teach this curriculum? Have all the teachers been trained to be able to teach to different learning styles and levels?

● The teachers on this team have 11 advanced degrees; 6 of our teachers have their National Board Certification.

● We are working with a literacy specialist from the UW College of Education, on reading and vocabulary strategies, and on differentiating readings.

● We are taking a 3-day workshop on "complex instruction," a pedagogy that focuses on effective, ethical, and meaningful group work and critical thinking, which will help students work together in a positive and supportive manner.

● We are working with project based learning as an approach that is highly engaging and succeeds at deeper understanding. We have considerable expertise on the team already with project based learning and a proven track record of project-based successes in AP classes based on pass rates on the AP exam.

● We are co-designing the courses and co-planning the lessons, so the courses will reflect our team’s best ideas. This close collaboration will allow us to revise and improve the courses for all students as the year progresses. The team, both social studies and ELA, will meet on a weekly basis in order deepen collaboration, provide feedback around lessons successes and improvements, and needed supports for students.

●Several teachers on the team have also studied and visited the New York Performance Standards Consortium, a group of small high schools in New York that focus on performance assessment.

●We will continue to reach out to a variety of experts for support and guidance throughout the school year.

Resources teachers are using to help them plan include (but are not limited to) the following:

● Detracking for Excellence and Equity by Carol Corbett Burris and Delia T. Garrity ● On the Same Track by Carol Corbett Burris

● Working for Equity in Heterogeneous Classrooms, Elizabeth G. Cohen and Rachel A. Lotan, eds ● Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom by Elizabeth Cohen

● Differentiation in Practice: A Resource Guide for Differentiating Curriculum, Grades 9-12 by Carol Ann Tomlinson

● Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom by Thomas Armstrong

● Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice by Howard Gardner ● Teaching English by Design by Peter Smagorinsky

● Strategic Reading by Jeffrey D. Wilhelm

● Academic Language for English Language Learners and Struggling Readers by Yvonne S. Freeman and David E. Freeman

● Deeper Reading by Kelly Gallagher

● Scaffolding the Academic Success of Adolescent English Language Learners by Aida Walqui and Leo van Lier

● Mindset: The New Psychology of Success by Carol Dweck

● Social Studies for Secondary Schools: Teaching to Learn, Learning to Teach by Alan J. Singer


Which other schools have made this change?

De-tracking classes is not a new change and is not unique to Garfield. It's been done in different ways in SPS, such as Nathan Hale offering only one track for 9th grade classes, or Roosevelt's AP-for-all model with 10th grade human geography.


Why do you think that this change will benefit all students?

● We believe in this change because it will allow

 ○ Enhanced engagement in learning
 ○ Interaction with peers in meaningful ways
 ○ Authentic interdependency
 ○ Greater control over academic products
 ○ Enhanced critical thinking by solving complex problems in a diverse classroom setting
 ○ The development of a truly inclusive environment

● Multiple research studies show that all students learn better in heterogeneous classrooms withhigh-level curriculum. From the book Detracking for Excellence and Equity, "Our studies (Burris et al., 2006; Burris et al., 2007) as well as the studies of others (Mosteller, Light, & Sachs, 1996; Slavin, 1990) have found that the achievement of highly talented students either is not affected or actually increases when detracking occurs. The key factor, of course, is ensuring that the curriculum remains challenging" (Burris & Garrity, 2008). We are dedicated to making this change benefit all students.

● Furthermore, many employers and colleges are saying that students need more experience problem solving in groups instead of memorizing facts. This curriculum adjustment will help build those "soft skills" employers are looking for.


Will teachers be given extra help in the classroom so no students are overlooked?

● Yes. The social studies and language arts department are sharing an AmeriCorps volunteer who will rotate among classes during the day and be available for after school study sessions, 5 days a week along with at least one teacher per day.

● We will continue to use volunteers from local universities and the community.

● Students who arrive at GHS who have not met standard on the reading portion of the MSP will be placed into a reading class, Read 180, in order to provide literacy support. This class will be in addition to their regular English class, which effectively doubles their time with reading instruction.


Will the classroom makeup be a full range of student abilities or will there be grouping of a range of students and the class size set accordingly?

● All 9th grade social studies and language arts classrooms will be heterogeneous classrooms. Thesocio-economic, racial, and ability differences of GHS will be reflected in every classroom.


Will the students still be prepared for the 10th grade AP World History test?

● Yes. Our lessons will still be tied to AP learning goals, as they currently are in honors World History. Our teachers have extensive experience with the world history AP requirements, including taking this year's AP Summer Institute for the new World History AP exam design. And by retaining the information better into 10th grade because of scaffolded support and differentiation, the students will actually be better prepared than they have in past years.


Will students still be prepared to move into AP English in 11th and 12th grade?

● Yes. We are not changing our standards or objectives. We are preparing all students to feel confident in choosing an AP class later, so we are still asking students to think deeply and engage in the curriculum at a high level.


Will class sizes be smaller?

● Yes. The 2016-17 budget allows for 9th grade classes to be smaller in order to better support all students.


What feedback have you gotten from students?

● Students are overwhelmingly in support of this change. Many students expressed concern about the Seattle Times article that discussed the achievement gap in SPS, which started classroom discussions about tracking. They are aware of the segregation and the subsequent labeling that occur because of the placement tests and tracking, consistently voicing a desire to interact with a wider variety of people.


Will students need to seek help on their own or will the teacher reach out to struggling students?

● As is currently the case, teachers will monitor student progress and suggest extra help for students who need it. This could come in many forms and will be addressed with students one- on-one,with parents, with other teachers, with counseling, and/or with administration.


How will classroom management issues be solved?

● Disruptive behavior comes in many forms and occurs in every classroom. All classroom management techniques and concerns will be addressed according to school policy. Our goal is to create a classroom environment that is engaging and safe for every student who enters. This environment decreases all types of disruptive behavior.


How will you measure the success of this change?

 Teachers will collaborate to develop assessments that measure student growth over time. They will use data from these assessments to guide their decision making.

 Students will also have the chance to give anonymous feedback at the end of each semester which will be reviewed by the team.


How will teachers keep parents informed about assignments, due dates, and other class happenings?

● We are committed to using Schoology and continuing our regular pathways of communication with parents, specifically with emails and phone calls.


How will you keep parents informed about the changes throughout the school year?

● Teachers will be participating in quarterly check-ins with the PTSA and communicate other changes via the GHS web site.


What literature would you recommend parents read to help them understand our change?

● Detracking for Excellence and Equity by Carol Corbett Burris and Delia T. Garrity.

● Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom by Elizabeth Cohen ● Any of the books on the list of resources provided earlier in this document.


Teachers on the Team


ELA
Social Studies


Adam Gish
Nathan King
Alan Kahn
Jeremy Lugo
Kit McCormick
Corey Allan Martin
Rosa Powers
Jerry Neufeld-Kaiser
Kirsten Otterby
Nathan Simoneaux
Andrea Soroko




ConvertedByBCLTechnologies

Garfield Official Website updated 7/13


Note: there appears to be a new survey to take.

Commenting

This is reminder to please avoid personal attacks and think before you post. "Poster X is a Y" posts are not appreciated here and will be deleted.